|
Post by Zhou Tai 04 on Nov 20, 2009 19:40:25 GMT -5
More like a lot of the time, but that goes for the media in general.
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 20, 2009 22:43:28 GMT -5
Let's not get started on how piss poor mainstream media is please
actually nvm
let's keep this thread bumped
Vandenberg and I have completely opposite points of view, that s**t ALWAYS comes down to faith vs. logic. He will insist one thing and I will just perpetually facepalm.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 20, 2009 22:44:48 GMT -5
Can faith ever become logic?
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 20, 2009 22:51:00 GMT -5
it would be an inherit contradiction, so no.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 20, 2009 22:54:34 GMT -5
Hmm, even if your faith was logical?
Because it is possible.
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 20, 2009 23:01:51 GMT -5
faith is the absence of logic.
there's a word for logical faith, it's called a hypothesis
if you have an educated guess that something exists or is going to happen, you need to have at least a shred of evidence.
There is no argument for the existence of God which is both sound and valid. You can predict God exists but you can never verify.
In science you can predict and verify. God is supernatural, science cannot test God via experiment.
|
|
|
Post by alastairjohnjack on Nov 20, 2009 23:14:52 GMT -5
Can faith ever become logic? Each person fabricates their own logic based on other peoples logic and their own observations. While faith could be logical for me, it may not be for someone else as it disrupts their logical foundations.
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 21, 2009 0:28:11 GMT -5
Can faith ever become logic? Each person fabricates their own logic based on other peoples logic and their own observations. While faith could be logical for me, it may not be for someone else as it disrupts their logical foundations.
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 21, 2009 1:35:14 GMT -5
Can faith ever become logic? Each person fabricates their own logic based on other peoples logic and their own observations. While faith could be logical for me, it may not be for someone else as it disrupts their logical foundations. This is basically what I was getting at, my dear Alastair
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 21, 2009 1:52:11 GMT -5
let this picture speak for me:
|
|
|
Post by alastairjohnjack on Nov 21, 2009 2:15:08 GMT -5
I can post a picture to demonstrate my ignorance too!
|
|
|
Post by Brent on Nov 21, 2009 2:22:51 GMT -5
pedo FILE!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Josh on Nov 21, 2009 10:01:16 GMT -5
let this picture speak for me: Whoa, its a flowchart. It must be true!
|
|
|
Post by Maarten on Nov 21, 2009 13:24:36 GMT -5
Brent, you should stop believing you know how everybody thinks, because you quite obviously don't have a clue.
|
|
|
Post by feverstone on Nov 21, 2009 14:07:15 GMT -5
I had a long response for you Brent. But in order to save time and pages (upon pages), I took the liberty to extract my useless comments concerning your illogical arguments, my irritatingly "witty" snippets, my sarcastic internet language, my passionate noob behavior and ALL long words.
I was left with:
Brent, you're wrong.
|
|